Forum has no rank but it can be rank :D

[MeToo]

You're serious about forum rank? omg. I was joking.

I'm not new and that's probably not fair. But what's fair these days? People can threaten bodily harm and death, sell products that may harm someone, falsify documents etc but there better not be any cronies around? I'm a friend but thank you for noticing. I croon too. How did you know?

Don't you think one against many has been enough Fritos? Please don't ask me to stand by and watch. And please don't ask me to stand by and watch someone get ripped off.

You are asking about regulating? When we just got done discussing how posts weren't being erased?

I think you have a personality conflict more than any sense of moral outrage too. You might look at a member directing a member that the place they were posting was the wrong place. You could look at another member getting angry with one speaking about magnetic bracelets. You could look at members raising very old questions dating back long before they signed on.

You could also look at the members that were making threats. You did not which does speak volumes.

Isadora, you are fully grown and not a new kid, yes ? This isn't about you so please don't worry.

But I digress. Is this what happened at Lymebusters?

Originally Posted by fritolay66

I absolutely have made no inference of you Isadora. Only Tc and her croonies.

That is exactly the problem I have outlined here. Here we have new kids on the block that don't know your rules and there for unwittingly become the official target of your self appointed vigilantism, how many are true sufferers? How much more pain is inflicted on them because of it? If you are the regulators of this forum, whom regulates you? And why hasn't it been announced that you are the official regulators?

Speaks volumes.

Frito

Jim sounds more coherent then when he was wishing someone would die of morgellons. That's more than a bad day especially when considering Sue.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

Frito you nailed it in this one. I see nothing you speak as being off in any way. I, had many rotten days and nights here where things were my fault. Brought on by me. This is an active forum and for someone to say look here or way back when or over there just cause its been brought up before is beyond anything with good thinking. Thats excepting someone to be the same as physic in which case if so who would need to post or ask. You said a lot more that was meaningful but I,ll stop now. Just well said Frito. Thanks.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

I don,t think ignor works on main board. correct me if i,m wrong.Like you i wish those two she dogs would drop off our planet to,along with 4 of my brothers to boot. world sometimes suck 2 pussies and 4 brothers later they all do.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

TCM< Drop dead of morgellons sickO.

[fritolay66]

You know what is really scary, is that you actually believe what you spew. I believe you believe your own BS. Red flag anyone? Give it a rest and hows about looking into your neurotransmitter status while your at it.

Frito

[JimDoe]

I meant it. I see you did not quote the rest of the thread.

[JimDoe]

Oh That was for M2

[MeToo]

You're calling people names too? Interesting.

I've had my say and you know where I stand.

Originally Posted by fritolay66

You know what is really scary, is that you actually believe what you spew. I believe you believe your own BS. Red flag anyone? Give it a rest and hows about looking into your neurotransmitter status while your at it.

Frito

And Jim knows I don't have to quote that thread or the visitor's messages where he is calling yet another member a fag policeman. Good luck you two.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

I meant it. I see you did not quote the rest of the thread.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

Oh That was for M2

[fritolay66]

Another fine example of just the "right little twist". There was no name calling specifically although I did make a couple of inferences and did use the initials BS to denote a belief in your own behaviour.

As far as what has transpired with Jim, I wasn't a part of any of that, and what he does, he is responsible for.

As far as neurotransmitters are concerned, I meant that whole heartedly. There seems to be a slew of quoting references made by individuals for many things, not only previous postings about this or that, but by behaviours and such by various people of this forum. So either you keep a separate log of these somewhere where you can easily access them to use in your posts, or you actively search for them in the previous posts of this forum. This behaviour indicates an obsessive-compulsive type of behaviour in which in most cases is due to an imbalance in neurotransmitters. So do yourself a big favor and look into it, or atleast do everybody else the favor.

Frito

Hi,

No, I am not a 'kid', but was using the phrase as a metaphor. And yet, we do all have a 'child' within our personality, as well as a 'parent' and an 'adult'.

The 'child' will be to the forefront when one is entering a new situation.

you are right, though, we do have to be 'adult' about this whole unholy mess. By that I mean the CDC having done an investigation without perhaps doing enough tests in the right way, (as far as I know).

It's frankly not good enough for the Westminster MP's to sit waiting.

[MeToo]

Implications made about someone who knows how to search and a quasi diagnoses which when used by a layman may be considered name calling of the oblique variety. Interesting.

She fancies herself accomplished in psychology? And yet she provides no answer to why she would not step into an argument unless specific personalities are involved. And she can't address what happened at lymbebusters. I wonder if she studies sociology too.

My guess is she only speaks in psychological terms when it is something she doesn't agree with. But wait. Checking out neurotransmitters sounds a little more like Trekkie science. That's not the proper term for the battery of tests she might be suggesting.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

I meant it. I see you did not quote the rest of the thread.

Originally Posted by JimDoe

Oh That was for M2

Originally Posted by fritolay66

Another fine example of just the "right little twist". There was no name calling specifically although I did make a couple of inferences and did use the initials BS to denote a belief in your own behaviour.

As far as neurotransmitters are concerned, I meant that whole heartedly. There seems to be a slew of quoting references made by individuals for many things, not only previous postings about this or that, but by behaviours and such by various people of this forum. So either you keep a separate log of these somewhere where you can easily access them to use in your posts, or you actively search for them in the previous posts of this forum. This behaviour indicates an obsessive-compulsive type of behaviour in which in most cases is due to an imbalance in neurotransmitters. So do yourself a big favor and look into it, or atleast do everybody else the favor.

Frito

[MeToo]

I think new situations may be handled with any of those personalities, Isadora. It just depends on emotional state and history.

Originally Posted by Isadora

Hi,

No, I am not a 'kid', but was using the phrase as a metaphor. And yet, we do all have a 'child' within our personality, as well as a 'parent' and an 'adult'.

The 'child' will be to the forefront when one is entering a new situation.

you are right, though, we do have to be 'adult' about this whole unholy mess. By that I mean the CDC having done an investigation without perhaps doing enough tests in the right way, (as far as I know).

It's frankly not good enough for the Westminster MP's to sit waiting.

[fritolay66]

My gawd, if I stepped into every argument that happened here, I would never get anything done. You make this into a joke. I owe you no explanation as far as Lymebusters goes. What many members both here and there don't realize is that there were other things happening behind the scenes there. So you can infer or make half truth claims all you want. It won't draw me out, it doesn't bother me in the slgihtest, and I won't justify your half baked claims. Simple.

And its obvious that you didn't understand a word of my post on hair. Its okay to admit it, really. Plug the keywords of my post into your address bar, and read about the quasi references to the exact same thing I have outlined in my post.

Also, about your indecisions on professional versus layman. So you want a doctor to diagnose you and treat you, so you are now willing to wait until they actually come up with something to treat, or advocate what you post in your thread instead, but when you don't agree with someone, you then bring out the joker card of me not being professional. Puleeze. I am not a practioner, I am in the same mess of Morgellons, lack of professional involvement, and learning and trying to find what helps. I see nothing by you that contributes to resolution of this mess, except your self appointed vigilantism. What basis do your beliefs stand on? Care to expound on your thoughts for Morgellons? Can you back it up with any type of medical information and how it occurs? Do you even have your own theory? What do you specifically contribute here?

Frito