Macroscopic Lyme in feces

[Kritters]

Knowing that sometimes latest posts are shown and people don't look back to see if others are new (like me)...

I just saw this on a google. I don't know anything about this site, whether it is one of those quackwatch faux 'we care' sites which are actually there to dispell and repress any valid information.

Lyme CD57 Test

I thought the CD57 was accurate.
xoxoKritts

[Katinka]

Or how about this one:

Lyme Disease Test
Lyme Disease Test

I'm afraid the newest test I mentioned isn't available in US yet.

Katinka

[Kritters]

thanks so much Kat....

xoxo

hey, I just went looking through some of my archived stuff and ...don't have time to find the thread...but remember I mentioned the "of all the gin joints.." thing regarding how ehrlichia and a few others are always present in the same tick tests?

The majority of the other positive ticks were infected with a newly identified Ehrlichia-like species. In addition, 13% of the ticks were infected with one or more B. burgdorferi genospecies. In more than 70% of the ticks 16S rRNA gene sequences for Bartonella species or other species closely related to Bartonella were found. In five of the ticks both Ehrlichia and B. burgdorferi species were detected.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2215-2222, Vol. 37, No. 7
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


lover ya,
Kritts

[Kritters]

you're kidding. not available in the freaking US? I can't believe this. OMG. I'll freaking travel to Europe.

[Katinka]

Yeah Kritts,
u can stay at my place...Augsburg where the Lyme Hospital is about quarter hour away.
So, how's that??
Kat

[Baraka Obam]

The coiled Spirochetes i have found in the dung. There is a question in my mind not all Spirochetes are lyme the can also be syphlis, now you know I have a thing about geneticly mutated by antibiotics, disease idea. I have this idea that the syphlis could have changed so much that it is undetectable by normal syphlis tests, BUT THE LYME TYPE TEST DOES SHOW IT. This is just an idea, will a lyme test pick up a mutated syphlis spirochetes. Then again why wouldn't it. Does it not seem strange to you that the test itself has so many factors, WHY is that, and even that is NOT a positive, it is THOUGHT to be positive. Somthing is fishy in DENMARK. What does a positive band mean, why are there so many, I am positive 7, why not more, is positive 7 an indicator of another Spirochetes disease. MAYBE!!!!

The Spirochetes were as clear as day, I could not get a picture of them as when I used the camera they disapered. I wish I could have shown you it, the coiled strand seemed awful long! Be on the lookout for these, it does take consentration to view these.

[Kritters]

Hey Baraka,

Yes, remember the photos I posted? I could see the fibers with my own eyes in the stool (it was coffee colored thank goodness) and I also found that gelatinous blob with fibers that looked like a jellyfish. That was exactly the same as in the picture of the borrellia burgdorferi. They live in tick haven and mosquitos are also biblical swarming level. She's got BB. No doubt in this old mind.

thanks,
xoKritts

[jonsi]

Hi Kritts,

How is your specimen "donor" doing?

Peace, xxoooxo
~jonsi

[Kritters]

yeah Katink,

I asked the person why she said that and her response today was that they don't test for lyme in the stool, so therefore it's not in there.

....and that if they were, there would be a test for it. She said what I saw were probably 'parasites' since they are usually along for the ride.

Can you imagine this???

That was all in pm's so right now I'm posting a new thread on that.

geeeez louizzze

Kritts xoxo

[Kritters]

Wow, some nasty peeps out there in Lymeland!!! Some nice ones also.....

My microscope mag is 10x, 20x, 30x, 40x... so this means 100-400 mag, correct?

Will one of you bio-sleuths check these two photos of Bb in blood from stool and tell me if my scope is powerful enough to see that? You know, I wonder if they grow larger in the intestines after a while that they've been there? I think one pic showed 522 mag and although I have 400, I can rarely use it.

A few of the self-appointed experts on microscoping are saying there's no way I could have isolated and identified the Bb with a layperson's scope. What a-holz.....

xoxoKritts http://www.jstd.org/journal/vol9s-s02/v9nss-02-bbgi.pdf