Franky's Forum and My Ignorance

[posey]

I am posting this here so that all can see. It is already posted on I think the 3rd page of another thread but to me that is buried. I am done and can take no more. When I turned 50 I made a promise to myself and that promise was made due to family feuds and such.

The promise to me: I will not argue with anyone about anything. I may have 20, 30 years left of my life and I will not waste them in arguing. To this day, if it is not a discussion, I walk away from anyone, even my husband. Better to talk later.

And now, I havre got to go. It is time to go get my CAT Scan. I called my Drs. nurse and asked that they give me the results today so If I hear anything I will let you know.

Hugs, love, and more to come, but forgive me if I am disappointing you.

posey

Here it is:

TCM,

Per your statements below; there you go again accusing me of so called "same hand washing". Not everyone is Internet saavy.

I am going to take it that what you say is true about Franky. Therefore, I will no longer speak of F-5. There is no way I want to cause adversity for anyone.

Franky, please accept my humble apology if indeed I did put you in some sort of jeopardy. I can assure you it was pure Internet Ignorance whether anyione believes it or not. Plus I was not selling anything.

Franky I tell you now, I will not talk about F-5 and ask that others do not also, or ask me anything about it. It can be read about at | You are not crazy – you can do this.

I sincerely regret I have brought this to your board and hope you hold no ill feelings towards me for it.

I guess we have to think of forums and such now days as someone's personal cyber property. Since I was acceptd as a member in 2008, I do not feel as if I have trespassed. But as I said, if I have dione simething wrong I am sincerely sorry but do not understand why I am just hearing about it now.

To everyone else who wanta to read about you know what, just go to the linbk above. I do not want any more trouble. I can just see the next poist is going to accuse me of future things already by saying I will now refer to it as "you know what". But friends, this is my last mention of this product on Franky's Forum, escept for 1 post which I have to do in order to inform all. It's not fair to post it here where my feeloings are hidden.


About Franky not being involved? Are you joking? No, I suppose this is more of the same hand washing we have encountered here before. Of course, if an owner of a site allows someone to sell an unknown product and there are bad reactions to it he will be liable, as he allowed information about it to be posted on his site. Not that any of you all seem to care about that (not just you).

[Janice]

You have a good day. We are all behind you.



.

[Baraka Obam]

Just remember, never swett the small stuff,

It is just a matter of time before those that must control all, will destroy all.

[tcmgpt13]

Just to add clarity to what is being only partially replied to by Posey in the first post of this new thread she decided to start (her posts and mine are actually found on another thread but since this discussion is being carried over to a new thread...):

Originally Posted by tcmgpt13

The way in which Gordon Stamp relinquished his license is in question. I looked at other cases which had the same type of legal terminology that Isadora mentioned. Usually there was some type of issue which made the state question if those who held a license should be able to keep it. So...the question is why did the state question his right to hold that license. (and don't give me that tired of excuse that it was only relinquished to help his family, the state would not bring this up because he has a sick family) Some people can have those issues removed by presenting their side of whatever issue there is and continue to practice, but this person did not do that? Why? Most people if they can prove they did nothing will actually go through the required review. So right now there is a question.

About baseball bats, asking questions which remain to this date unanswered are not bats. They are questions and deserve answers, but it is obvious none will ever be forthcoming. This remains a product which has unknown ingredients made by a person who will not reveal why he had to relinquish his license to practice as a nurse. I have to wonder why he could not wait until everything was legal and above board BEFORE selling this product to others who are very sick? And no, the he is such a humanitarian is not the reason either. To be humane would be to allow people to know what they are buying and how it may affect them. If for no other reasons for the allergic reaction reasons or the medication interaction reasons.

About Franky not being involved? Are you joking? No, I suppose this is more of the same hand washing we have encountered here before. Of course, if an owner of a site allows someone to sell an unknown product and there are bad reactions to it he will be liable, as he allowed information about it to be posted on his site. Not that any of you all seem to care about that (not just you).

Any choice made without knowing what is in a product is an uninformed choice. Right now I am using some herbs to cleanse the kidneys of stones (most likely small). This formula seems to be moving out some stuff I have not seen move out before though some of the shapes are familiar (having emerged from the skin). It is also bringing all that dry white stuff (dots and powdered dry skin) to the surface of the skin and it does not cost $200 to buy these herbs. It also seems to be powdering some of those brown and gray freckles on the skin. I can make the formula myself and I know what is contained in it, organic herbs from a reliable herb shop (she knows most of her suppliers who grow them and has visited their farms).

[Janice]

I think this may clear up some things for you.....I know what's her face talkes like she knows every thing and wants to make you feel bad. She speeks out of her *** not her mouth.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C.*§*230. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others:
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by this provision, courts generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity:
The defendant must be a "provider or user" of an "interactive computer service."
The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must "treat" the defendant "as the publisher or speaker" of the harmful information at issue.
The information must be "provided by another information content provider," i.e., the defendant must not be the "information content provider" of the harmful information at issue.

[posey]

Janice, I thank you so much. I really appreciate your clearing that up for me.

However, I don't understand all that is going on and I do not want to be a part of it any longer. I can't say anything without it being torn to bits and made to be what someone else wants it to say. Like I said, I don't get it but I'm done. If this was supposed to be a battle of some sort well then I surrender.

Notice I am not mentioning names. "Whomever" has won. I'm done. I lost the battle, but hey, I may win the war.

I feel bad for those who wanted me to keep them up to date. But like I said, it will be at | You are not crazy – you can do this. and other places.

So now, do I have to worry about being hunted down on the internet? I feel like I am some sort of criminal. Did I do any criminal acts here? Have I been that bad? Gee, I use to think I was a pretty nice person but from a lot of what's posted here, I must be an A-1 A hole and a big jerk. Oh well, better to learn now than later, maybe I can change.

What did I do to be made out as the aforementioned? Somebody please tell me because apparently I am ignorant here also.

[Janice]

Did you notice the tags on the bottom of the f5 thread. What is that all about?

[posey]

What tags, what do you mean?

[posey]

I found them Janice, but I can't care right now. My Dr. just called me about my CT Scan for my lungs today. I don't know if you have read that thread.

Everything is OK

Nothing has changed and she thinks that maybe the Pulmonary Embolism may be dissolving!!!! I'm so happy!!

But hey, thanks so much for keeping me in the light.

[Janice]

The tags underneath the last post on "posey update" thread for f5
I know what they do , just wondered who put them there.