Too much Radiation--Venetia had a thread on this
Morgellons-Morgellons Disease

Go Back   Morgellons-Morgellons Disease > Morgellons > Morgellons Disease (Fiber Disease)
Forgot Password? Join Us!

Morgellons Disease (Fiber Disease) General discussion on Morgellons Disease


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2010, 12:52 PM
kmar is a believer that with effort wishes can come true!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 492
Default Too much Radiation--Venetia had a thread on this

Americans get most radiation from medical scans



AP – In this photo taken June 3, 2010, Dr. Steven Birnbaum works a CT scanner with a patient at Southern New …



By MARILYNN MARCHIONE, AP Medical Writer Marilynn Marchione, Ap Medical Writer – 35 mins ago

We fret about airport scanners, power lines, cell phones and even microwaves. It's true that we get [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]too [COLOR=#366388! important]much [/color][COLOR=#366388! important]radiation[/color][/color][/color]. But it's not from those sources — it's from too many medical tests.

Americans get the most medical radiation in the world, even more than folks in other rich countries. The U.S. accounts for half of the most advanced procedures that use radiation, and the average American's dose has grown sixfold over the last couple of decades.

Too much radiation raises the [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]risk [COLOR=#366388! important]of [/color][COLOR=#366388! important]cancer[/color][/color][/color]. That risk is growing because people in everyday situations are getting imaging tests far too often. Like the New Hampshire teen who was about to get a CT scan to check for kidney stones until a radiologist, Dr. Steven Birnbaum, discovered he'd already had 14 of these powerful X-rays for previous episodes. Adding up the [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]total [COLOR=#366388! important]dose[/color][/color][/color], "I was horrified" at the cancer risk it posed, Birnbaum said.

After his own daughter, Molly, was given too many scans following a car accident, Birnbaum took action: He asked the two hospitals where he works to watch for any patients who had had 10 or more [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]CT [COLOR=#366388! important]scans[/color][/color][/color], or patients under 40 who had had five — clearly dangerous amounts. They found 50 people over a three-year period, including a young woman with 31 abdominal scans.
When other radiologists tell him they've never found such a case, Birnbaum replies: "That tells me you haven't looked."
Of the many ways Americans are overtested and overtreated, imaging is one of the most common and insidious. CT scans — "super X-rays" that give fast, extremely detailed images — have soared in use over the last decade, often replacing tests that don't require radiation, such as ultrasound and MRI, or [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]magnetic [COLOR=#366388! important]resonance [/color][COLOR=#366388! important]imaging[/color][/color][/color].

Radiation is a hidden danger — you don't feel it when you get it, and any damage usually doesn't show up for years. Taken individually, tests that use radiation pose little risk. Over time, though, the dose accumulates.
Doctors don't keep track of radiation given their patients — they order a test, not a dose. Except for mammograms, there are no federal rules on [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]radiation [COLOR=#366388! important]dose[/color][/color][/color]. Children and young women, who are most vulnerable to radiation harm, sometimes get too much at busy imaging centers that don't adjust doses for each patient's size.

That may soon change. In interviews with The Associated Press, U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials described steps in the works, including possibly requiring device makers to print the radiation dose on each X-ray or other image so patients and doctors can see how much was given.

The FDA also is pushing industry and doctors to set [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]standard [COLOR=#366388! important]doses[/color][/color][/color] for common tests such as CT scans.

"We are considering requirements and guidelines for record-keeping of dose and other technical parameters of the imaging exam," said Sean Boyd, chief of the FDA's diagnostic devices branch.

A near-term goal: developing a "radiation medical record" to track dose from cradle to grave.

"One of the ways we could improve care is if we had a running sort of Geiger counter" that a doctor checked before ordering a test, said Dr. Prashant Kaul of Duke University.

He led an eye-opening study that found that U.S. heart attack patients get the [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]radiation [COLOR=#366388! important]equivalent[/color][/color][/color] of 850 chest X-rays over the first few days they are in the hospital — much of it for repeat tests that may not have been needed.

How much radiation is risky?
It's hard to say. The best guess is based on the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident and studies of Japanese atomic b survivors who had excess cancer risk after exposures of 50 to 150 millisieverts (a measure of dose) of radiation.
A chest or abdominal CT scan involves 10 to 20 millisieverts, versus 0.01 to 0.1 for an ordinary chest X-ray, less than 1 for a mammogram, and as little as 0.005 for a dental X-ray. Natural radiation from the sun and soil accounts for about 2 millisieverts a year.


A big study last year estimated that 4 million Americans get more than 20 millisieverts a year from medical imaging. Two percent of people in the study had high exposure — 20 to 50 millisieverts.

Another study by Columbia University researchers, published in 2007, estimated that in a few decades, as many as 2 percent of all cancers in the U.S. might be due to radiation from CT scans given now. Since [COLOR=#366388! important][COLOR=#366388! important]previous [COLOR=#366388! important]studies[/color][/color][/color] suggest that a third of all tests are unnecessary, 20 million adults and more than 1 million children are needlessly being put at risk, they concluded.

Just because a scan didn't find anything wrong doesn't mean a test wasn't needed. Scans are useful for many diagnoses. But many studies suggest people are getting too much imaging now. For example, Mayo Clinic researchers reviewed the medical records of 251 people given heart scans in 2007 and found that only a quarter of them were clearly appropriate.
Reasons for overuse:


Rest of article here;
Americans get most radiation from medical scans - Yahoo! News
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2010, 12:54 PM
kmar is a believer that with effort wishes can come true!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 492
Default

I didn't add all that "COLOR" codes............the article
was copied and pasted and it just showed up.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2010, 06:23 PM
carla is a bit itchy
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Liverpool UK
Posts: 3,292
Default

And what do they do to people with Cancer ! It makes me sick .

We also get radiated by Computer screens ,wireless,mobile phones and now airport body scanners .
Great isn't it .
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump
Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For KC - Thread Locked: Why? Enviro Girl Support 1 February 16th, 2010 07:44 PM
Hypotheses Thread Kritters Morgellons Theories & Speculations 0 August 12th, 2009 08:54 PM
1 1/2 inch red thread in my eye sudio Morgellons Treatment 7 January 26th, 2009 04:14 PM
Website Help Thread! Franky Suggestions/Website Requests 6 November 5th, 2008 07:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 AM.

Community Twit

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
MDR-Morgellons 2011
Main Forum, General Discussion, Morgellons Disease (Fiber Disease), Morgellons Treatment, Morgellons Cure, Lyme Disease, Scabies, World News, Morgellons Syndrome, Scabies Treatment, Lyme Disease Treatment, Complementary and Alternative Therapies, Morgellons Theories & Speculations, Introduce Yourself, Administrative Announcements, Suggestions/Website Requests, Complaints, Media, Guest Posting, Non-Recommended Products, Morgellons Poll, Morgellons Pictures, Insects, Parasites, Mites & Ticks, Members' Lounge, Admin & Mod Discussions, Health, Diet, Wellbeing & Weight Loss, Morgellons Disease Live Chat, Recycled, Antidepressants, Help Videos, The Rant Board, Morgellons Housekeeping Cleansing Tips, Morgellons And Pets, Support, Financial Aid, Healthy Cooking & Eating, Health Insurance, Medical News, lyme Disease Symptoms, Lyme Disease Doctors, Lyme Disease Alternative Treatments, Chronic Lymes Disease, Chronic Lyme Disease Treatment, Lyme Disease Prognosis, Drug-Alcohol Rehab/Suicide Prevention

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46