Big Brother to track your medication compliance with electronic transmitters in pills

[posey]

Big Brother to track your medication compliance with electronic transmitters in pills

This is from the Health Ranger Mike Adams. To the best of my knowledge he is a credible person and very wise.

This may not apply to "M", however, it shows the capacity of the capabilities which are brewing.

NaturalNews) Now that the U.S. government has achieved its monopoly over health care, new technologies are in the works that will allow the government to remotely monitor and track whether ordinary citizens are complying with taking medications prescribed by conventional doctors. One new technology described at the U.S. Senate Committee on Aging allows "pills to be electronically outfitted with transmitters" which would track the patient's compliance with medications and broadcast that information back to government health care enforcers who check for "compliance and efficacy."

"Emerging technologies allow pills to be electronically outfitted with transmitters to communicate with the user's wristwatch that shows that the pill has been consumed," said University of Virginia professor Robin Felder at the committee meeting. "Broadband connectivity of these devices would allow the electronic medical record to be updated with regard to medication compliance and efficacy."

This would allow government health operators, for example, to know whether you've taken all your prescribed psychiatric medications. If you veer from the course of pharmaceuticals prescribed by your doctor, health care enforcement agents could be dispatched to your door to make sure you start taking your pills.

Parents who currently attempt to protect their children from toxic medical therapies such as chemotherapy could be closely monitored by government medical enforcement agents. If you try to flush dangerous pharmaceuticals down the toilet instead of actually taking them, the lack of an electronic tracking signal will let your health care observers know you didn't really take the pills.


Get ready for E-Care
It's all part of a new push called E-Care which involves a number of medical devices that monitor you in your home and report back to government authorities. A blood pressure monitoring device, for example, could report your blood pressure to your government-approved doctor. A blood sugar monitoring device could determine if you've eaten too much sugar and order you to take more diabetes pills to try to compensate.

Big Government, you see, doesn't just want to monopolize health care; it wants to monitor your compliance with it. If you depart from their system of pharmaceuticals, you may be found unfit as a parent, for example. Or possibly just declared insane (which gets you drugged with psych meds).


Big Brother snooping in on your diet
One of the ultimate goals of this remote monitoring technology is to install a blood monitoring chip in your arm that would sample and run diagnostic tests on your blood every few minutes. While this could be used in a positive way to detect early signs of cancer or liver problems, for example, it could also be used to snoop on the dietary habits of everyday citizens.

If you take too much vitamin C, for example -- beyond what is allowed by CODEX -- it could trigger a monitored alert that causes government-run medical operatives to force their way into your home and confiscate your "non-compliant" vitamins.

If your vitamin D levels rise high enough to actually prevent cancer, they could have you arrested for "spending too much time in the sun" and thrown into a hospital with no windows to, as they claim, "Protect you from skin cancer."

These are some of the very practical realities that could theoretically emerge in the dystopian medicalized society that seems to be getting closer with each passing day.


We're monitoring you for your own good
This isn't science fiction: It's modern medical fact. As CNSNews reports, "...Areas of interest include medicines that can tell a doctor if they have been taken on time [and] wireless monitoring of nutritional information..."

Of course, as with all privacy-invading monitoring devices, government will argue that monitoring you is "for your own good." You can expect an RFID chip to be implanted in your arm, too, containing your entire medical history. So every time you pass near an RFID reader at a government-controlled facility (airports, schools, interstate toll booths, etc.), your entire medical history can be scanned and assessed for a variety of metrics.

[tcmgpt13]

So, when this medical monitoring starts I suppose the calendar will be rolled back too. Thanks for sharing Posey. Let us hope it is not too late.

1984. I wish it was the old 1984, not the one which is envisioned in the article above.

Interesting thing is Orwell, the writer of the book 1984, was a Social Democrat and supported the Labour party in Great Britain:

My recent novel [Nineteen Eighty-Four] is NOT intended as an attack on Socialism or on the British Labour Party (of which I am a supporter), but as a show-up of the perversions . . . which have already been partly realized in Communism and Fascism. . . . The scene of the book is laid in Britain in order to emphasize that the English-speaking races are not innately better than anyone else, and that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph anywhere.
—Collected Essays [21]

Nineteen Eighty-Four - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[KiraErikson]

The quickest way to lower medical costs would be to allow citizens to order their drugs overseas. I get the anti-parasitic medication I need from India at about 2% of the cost that the same drug would be in the United States -- except I can't even get this life saving drug prescribed in the quantity I need in the US, because US doctors are told by a computer program to only prescribe about one or two pills a month or it will kill the patient. Yet I've taken 8 pills a day of 12 mg of Stromectol for months to control my Morgellons, and my Morgellons may be about 97% gone now (depending upon how much could be hidden internally).

Before I could get massive doses of Stromectol, my Morgellons was expanding exponentially and might have killed me in 3 or 4 years. It had so disfigured me in just 3 months that people would see me and immediately walk away. This was a very isolating illness. Now that my skin lesions are fading I'm constantly taken by surprise when people are friendly to me on the street and treat me like an attractive normal female again.

My point is that the reason healthcare in the US is so expensive is that the US govt. cares more about documenting and controlling our individual medical care than it actually cares about us being healthy. I know that my last 200 visits to doctors over the past 5 years (mostly for an underlying metabolic problem and chronic fatigue) would have been unnecessary if I could have only ordered the drugs I needed overseas. I am forced to spend 5 days a month seeing doctors and filing prescriptions because the drugs I used to buy overseas were being confiscated by the US govt. Fortunately, although my anti-parasitic medication gets investigated (the US govt. loves to open my mail and send me little notes with it -- like "Keep this up and we'll come take your home computer") someone in charge is allowing me to continue getting the medication -- and they do forward the envelopes containing it retaped up.

I wish I didn't understand that the American people are no longer free. I also can easily speculate as to what future plans are -- such as controlling where one's cars can go on the freeway using computer programs. You won't even know certain roads exist as they won't be in your mapping system. They're also equipping cars to that law enforcement can make them stop, or speed up and crash "accidentally."

If the govt. knows what pills you're taking, in the future they just need to set up a system where your pills are sent to you automatically by a "private" pill filling supply house -- and then the govt. can add something deadly to your set up pills that kills you slowly.