Chlamydia pneumonia bacteria article for LC

[tcmgpt13]

LC,

I know you are a proponent of the connection between morgellons and chlamydia pneumonia bacteria.

This article will interest you (I believe):

http://www.ra-infection-connection.com/Chlamart.htm

As far as I can figure out this is a company (there may be more than one company doing research) which may be researching a vaccine for chlamydia pneumonia:

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/st...1634686&EDATE=

The interesting thing is that I also saw mention on google that this company may be doing something which involves nanotechnology drug delivery. More on the vaccine development:

http://jmm.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/full/52/7/537

best,

tcm

[ladycolorado]

gosh tcm thanks. yeah i guess i belive my former doc current chairman of the mrf, he told me about chylamidia pneumonia being the trigger for this among other factors and the weak link. since he has had this disease himself (he was in a wheelchair for two years due to morgellons disease) and pioneered this treatment i have been given so yes of course i support this. plus, feeling much better than i was i think his reasoning is sound. he really tried to help me to his credit gave me all generics and posseses no guile whatsoever, just a dogged determination to eradicate this disease being problematic. plus yes i take comfor in its links to other diseases, if our strangeness somehowthe fact you found this thanks a bunch, can you tell me what search engine you use? i think interesting talks of nanobacteria. i am not big nano person but think toxic exposure of one kind or another for sure a factor. i think a few or more factors at least, like we win the powerball from hades or something. but like i said with the source yes i believe, and i thik the tinkering going on has made toxic exposure worse for all mankind. it is no longer the knights of camelot in a green avalon. i think part nature, part tinkering, part stupidity and greed and part deliberate malevolence part sheer ignorance. but nano could be a definanately be a part of it, this paper says nano bacteria involved. so you will not see me buying the NEW sleepmed from walgreens advertised saying "aided with nanotechnology". i prefer on healing what god made, even if it is flawed, (LC).

[tcmgpt13]

Hi LC,

No special search engine, just google, and research brought up the articles. I had some time tonight to see what I might find on the subject. It does all sound interesting.

About the nanos, I do not know whether it is a good idea to use in medicines either or any safer than other applications on nanos to foods, cosmetics and gosh knows what else. I only mention nanos because if that particular company is behind the chlamydia pneumonia vaccine and succeeds in making one which can be used on human subjects then what will be in the vaccine delivery system of that vaccine? Will nanos be involved?

I agree with you that I would rather use what is made by God, but it would seem that we have no control over what is happening in the country. According to a recent Consumer Reports article many companies are now hiding the fact they are adding nanos to their products, so that consumers will buy their products without knowing that nanos are in it (for those consumers who have done research and would like to make an informed decision). How wicked and sick is that? It is just likefood being irradiated without the consumer knowing that it is being irradiated. All to cover up food which would not be safe to eat if processed in a normal fashion. And they wonder why people are getting fatter and sicker. Well, duh.

best,

tcm