VITAMIN C STORY:
http://www.rifeenergymedicine.com/vitaminc.html
A dosage of 10 grams a day of vitamin C was given to 100 terminally ill ("untreatable") cancer patients. A control group of 1,000 terminal cancer patients matched for sex, age and type of cancer received no vitamin C. The results of this study were rather significant. The average survival rate of the vitamin C patients, at the time of the reporting of the study in 1978, was 4.2 times larger than that of the control group. Moreover, the degree of subjective pain was much less and quality of life much greater for the vitamin C treated patients. Perhaps most striking was the fact that 16 of the 100 vitamin C treated patients were still alive in 1980, all of the 1,000 controls had died.
After the publishing of the Cameron - Pauling cancer study in 1978 the allopathic medical community generally criticized the results on ostensibly methodological grounds ( It was not a double blind test as though the placebo effect could give the cures found. ), though it was clear that researchers did not believe vitamin C could have a significant effect in the treatment of cancer. In other words the non - nutritionally trained allopathic medical doctors believed their own erroneous medical school training as to the non - significance of nutrition in disease occurrence and disease out come. In an effort to discredit the results of the Cameron - Pauling study the corrupt administrative leadership at the National Institutes of Health funded two studies carried out by the Mayo Clinic. No effect upon the survival rates of terminal cancer patients receiving vitamin C was found in the first Mayo Clinic study. However, this study was severely publicly criticized by Cameron supporters because the study subjects had all previously gone through devastating chemotherapy, suppressing their immune systems to the point where vitamin C could be of little benefit. And the study / trail was certainly not comparable to the Cameron - Pauling study.
Due to the non - validity of the first Mayo Clinic study, the Mayo Clinic carried out a second study. This study was even more discrediting to the Mayo Clinic's competence and integrity. In the second study (a double blind study) the placebo was easily identifiable, and the control patients were not monitored regularly to determine whether they were taking vitamin C on their own. Only six of the 50 control patients were tested only once, for urine levels of vitamin C. Five of the six control patients had levels of around 500 mg vitamin C in the urine per day. The sixth control patient had 1,200 mg of vitamin C in their urine. Since unsupplemented cancer patients normally have less than 10 mg vitamin C in their urine per day it is a safe bet that the control patients were taking significant to large amounts of vitamin C on their own. The fact that the Mayo Clinic "doctors" did nothing about this situation showed a great lack of integrity on their part. In fact the Mayo Clinic doctors tried to falsely maintain that the vitamin C levels in the urine of the tested control patients was "negligible" . It perhaps should be no wonder that the survival rate of the vitamin C group and the control group were about the same sense both groups were apparently taking comparable amounts of vitamin C. To further compound the inadequacy of the Mayo Clinic's second study the researchers stopped giving vitamin C to its test patients after only two and a half months. Where as Cameron continued his patients on vitamin C indefinitely.
One tangential result of the second study which the Mayo Clinic researchers did not want to focus on was that a group of cancer patients who refused to take part in the study had only about half the survival rate of both the vitamin C and control groups, even though the study lasted only a pathetic two and a half months.
In March of 1985, in front of the House Sciences and Technology Committee Cameron called for an authoritative, competent, and honest test of the efficacy of vitamin C cancer therapy:
"Whether vitamin C is of any help to cancer patients is still uncertain. I sincerely believe that the National Cancer Institute has a duty to the American public to fund a properly designed trial to answer this question once and for all. Such a trial must not be carried out by vitamin C enthusiasts nor by bigots, but by fair - mined skeptics, and conducted not in secrecy but in open cooperation using a mutually agreed protocol with particular attention given to ensuring that the controls are not also taking vitamin C."
"If such a competently run trial failed to show any benefit from vitamin C, I would be prepared to be a co-author and repudiate all my previous statements to the contrary. However, if such a competently run trial demonstrated beyond doubt that vitamin C had therapeutic value, as I am convinced it would, a new, simple and very safe form of treatment would be available for all cancer patients world - wide as a supportive measure alongside other forms of cancer treatment of proven value. Such a finding would also brand the Mayo Clinic performance as the medical scandal of the decade, if not the century."
I personally believe that Dr. Cameron was far to kind to the Mayo Clinic and by inference the National Institutes of Health. Also, I believe the medical scandal of the decade, the century, and the millennium must be reserved for the U.S.C. Medical School Special Medical Research Committee for their damnable suppression of Dr. Royal Raymond Rife's discoveries and accomplishments.
Please note that since that 1985 House Science and Technology Committee testimony of Cameron, that the National Institutes of Health has still not supported or carried out "a competently run trial" on the use of vitamin C for cancer therapy or any other disease, such as those demonstrated by Dr. Klenner's work to be curable by large doses of vitamin C. The simple truth is, that the corrupt administrators at the National Institutes of Health do not dare to carry out "a competently run trial". To do that would be to risk a revolution in allopathic medicine. For example, after "a competently run trial" people might wonder if the survival rate of cancer patients might go far beyond the sixteen out of a hundred , which Cameron experienced for "terminal" patients, if the treatment were started early on. Some might even think to go to much higher treatment levels than 10 grams of vitamin C a day. My god, who knows what and where "a competently run trial" might lead to.
It is a chance the corrupt administrators at the National Institutes of Health can not , dare not take. There is far to much illness, misery, and death money at stake. My god, what would happen to the allopathic medical establishment if we the people stop putting approximately one seventh of our economy through their pockets?