Cureme,
I haven’t posted on the forum for well over a year now and your childish, deliberately insulting post toward me is a perfect example of why I haven’t posted in so long. Some people simply want to display their own ignorance and ill manners rather than contribute something of use to others. I do still read the forum occasionally for entertainment as much as anything these days. When I read your ill-informed, misguided insults toward me I decided I simply could not let your post go unanswered.
I notice that you didn’t actually address ANYTHING I stated in my analysis, obviously because you CAN’T ACTUALLY REFUTE ANTYHING I SAID WITH LOGIC OR FACTS! Thus, as many people do when they actually CANNOT ARGUE FACTS, you regressed to juvenile personal attacks against someone you know absolutely nothing about.
I just noticed on another thread that you said people were wrong and mean for saying anything about someone they didn’t know - is that “rule” for everyone EXCEPT YOU? Judging by your post to me it would appear that you believe that you (and other myrmidons that agree with your unquestioning and slavish promotion of Staninger) are the only people that are allowed to insult others on this forum without “knowing them”.
First, you certainly owe Einstein a huge apology and you also owe me and many third graders an apology for implying that Staninger knows more than we do (I’ll explain why you owe us an apology a bit later in this post so that even you can understand). To answer your question to me regarding my “scientific background”,
my background is SUPER DUPER DOUBLE TOP SECRET and I am not at liberty to divulge this information ………..does it sound as dodgy and ridiculous when I say that to you as it does when you claim the same nonsense about Staninger in your posts? It certainly should if you have any objectivity. If Staninger’s “scientific background” is supposedly such a closely guarded “state secret” as you imply, why was she at liberty to divulge her background to you?
If you want to know my “scientific background” you can read the posts I’ve made as I have mentioned my education and background in multiple posts. I am confident that my educational credentials would compare quite favorably to Staninger’s because the degrees I have earned are from well respected, fully accredited institutions of higher learning – not fly-by night, unaccredited diploma mills that award any degree you desire if you pay for it.
Here’s a question for you –
are you one of Staninger’s PAID minions (what Staninger calls her “internet marketing team”) that troll around on Morgellons forums trying to promote her and her “protocol” and to discredit anyone that has the temerity to disagree with her nonsensical rubbish or are you simply someone that is so emotionally fragile that you can’t bear to objectively and rationally examine the utterly ridiculous theories of someone that you apparently idolize?
I have noticed over the last couple of months that all of the active Morgellons forums seem to have several posters now that are aggressively pushing Staninger and her outlandish theory (and of course her “cure” and protocol) and I’m sure this is not by mistake.
None are so blind as those who REFUSE to see ……….or to paraphrase a bit, none are so blind as those that are actually PAID TO NOT SEE (which I think is more likely the case with you). Thus, if you refuse to SEE the actual truth as is proven by Staninger’s own words (and it ain’t the nonsense she is pushing herself),
no amount of actual facts and evidence that I or anybody else presented to you would be able to help you see or admit the actual facts of this matter. Now to the points I have addressed previously in this thread that your own recent post to me unwittingly proves: First, I have stated that people who don’t have an education and background in a scientific discipline (like you obviously) might be easily duped by people like Staninger that cobble together a bit of techno-babble with some medical double-speak as a means of creating a confusing, false paradigm to apparently deceive sick, desperate and gullible people (more gullible than they might be if they weren’t so sick and desperate) into believing a literal fairy tale. Without the background and education to recognize what complete nonsense she appears to be ridiculously claiming as being “proven fact” these days (when it really isn’t even a credible theory by any stretch of the imagination), some people might simply think that what Staninger says sounds “really scientific” and she does have several letters after her name so she must know what she is talking about ……. sadly, nothing could be further from the truth.
From all I have seen, the actual words Staninger speaks and writes have NO VALID MEANING whatsoever in the context of reality or logical scientific thinking.
In Staninger’s own words she stated that someone SENT her a sample (apparently through the mail according to what she wrote) that the person BELEIVED was skin that “fell off her foot”. Staninger sent this sample to a lab and
the lab results PROVED THAT THIS SAMPLE WAS MAINLY HDPE – NOT SKIN. If Staninger were actually a brilliant, credible scientist that you claim she is she would have reached the ONLY LOGICAL CONCLUSION POSSIBLE and recognized that the person that sent her the sample was simply mistaken in thinking the piece of plastic that “fell off her foot” was skin. What are the ONLY ACTUAL FACTS here? A sample was tested by a laboratory and determined to be HDPE! EVERYTHING ELSE STATED IS PURE CONJECTURE THAT IS SUPPORTED BY NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER! AS PROVEN BY STANINGER’S OWN LAB TESTS the sample tested was ACTUALLY A SMALL PIECE OF PLASTIC that “fell off” the woman’s foot – pieces of skin do not just “fall off” your foot, but plastic that was stuck on your foot would and could at some point (and there is a picture shown in the report that shows that it is clearly a pink-tinted piece of plastic rather than skin).
However, Staninger BLATANTLY IGNORED WHAT HER OWN LAB REPORT ACTUALLY SHOWED (that the sample was a readily identifiable plastic RATHER THAN SKIN) and with NO EVIDENCE OF ANY KIND concocted the wildly ridiculous, nonsensical blather that the sample was actually plastic that had been produced in human skin as part of a supposed fiber optic network being created by nano-sized “robots” that have infiltrated the human body.
This is NOT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AT ALL but instead wildly ridiculous speculation based on NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING.
- continued in next post