Quote:
That’s just one piece of evidence against living nanobacteria named in a recent study by Jan Martel of Chang Gung University in Taiwan and John Ding-E Young from The Rockefeller University in New York, which was published in PNAS. Martel and Young have studied healthy human blood serum that contains what they call “nanobacteria-like particles” (NLP), composed of the compound calcium carbonate (CaCO3), or limestone. The researchers performed a series of experiments showing that the tiny particles contain no traces of DNA or RNA, and suggest that their formation can be explained by non-biological means.
“We believe that this study provides substantive proof that nanobacteria are not living entities,” Young told PhysOrg.com. “Some previous studies have hinted that this is the case, but have not provided a chemical composition or formulation that could explain the nanobacteria phenomenon in its entirety.”
end excerpt
Basically, what they are calling Nanobacteria has been found in rock - limestone and is present everywhere in the world and has been so since time began.
What it is- calcium carbonate aka Calcite aka nanobacteria
Where it was found:
Calcite was found at Suny in the Morgellons specimens: Thanks to Mark Darrah and Dr Citovsky
Morgellons Research at Suny
Fair use Excerpt:
Image 1: White Fiber – Calcite covered
End excerpt
I would be willing to bet that the sponge theory would fit in there nicely.... |
Yes it sure does Venetia, calcium carbonate in the crystal forms of calcite or aragonite are among the more common secretions from sponges, they also secrete magnesium calcite, silica, and collagen.
Thanks