[Nickthebuilder]

Carla, if you feel that I was trying to attack you, then let me say I'm sorry if it came across that way, that was not my intent at all. I wasn't looking at your post as a moderator post and treating it with superiority, I was looking at it as the post of another individual who obviously didn't care what I had to say, and therefor did exactly what Mark had said, and degraded the logic of a hypothesis I was trying to get out there. Such a reply is an insult to legitimate research and yes, after you locked my thread, I was trying to point out that you didn't do anything but kill legitimate scientific theory. If you wanted me to debate it with you, you should have brought more to the table than blank negativity. I was here for fair scientific debate, not to repeat myself to individuals whose intent showed nothing more than despair and negativity.

I didn't do anything here to cause havok, that's a blunt lie. As gigi said, I didn't have to share the information I discovered, but I did, and it's more a matter of people not being able to grasp the scientific aspect of my theory and treatment rather than engaging in a legitimate debate. If I say that UFO fiction and nano fiction has no place here, it's because I understand the scientific process involved in identification of a pathogen and there is no proof whatsoever to justify those claims. If there was, I would be open to it, but nobody has offered any proof whatsoever and this only hurt the attempt for research that we all claim to be here for. My claims have legitimate backing, most of which is imaged on Carnicoms page, others which I have tested in my own lab, otherwise I wouldn't mention them because there is no room for nonsense here.

Jonsi, go ahead and ignore me, my information has reached all those who care to give it any credit and try the treatment, and I won't post anymore relevant scientific theory on any board from this point on. As for your other comments, you are the one fabricating lies and this is a fact. How interesting that you correspond with others from the other board, who also think I'm crazy. As far as I know, they never helped anyone with their undebated psuedoscience yet I have gotten several emails thanking me for the information I provided and informing me of how helpful it has been in treatment. Also, I never "dogged" Carnicom. If you actually took the time to read and understand what I wrote, you would see that I was being objective to his research, and clearly stated that even though I saw reason to be objective due to the sheer insanity of RBC's forming from mouth extractions (which carnicom even states himself several times, is "beyond current understanding") that I was nevertheless giving him the benefit of the doubt and therefor forming my theory based on this information in his recent study. That means, in simple terms (since you keep trying to lie and put words into my mouth) that I justified far more reasons that would back his personal interest in the truth rather than misinformation. You know, misinformation is a large part of why this "morgellons" pathogen is getting nowhere, so being objective is within the lines of any work done. I'm 100% sure that Carnicom would fully agree with that statement, and I'm willing to bet he is not the type of person who would want everyone to read his information without making sense of it first.

So, no more need to lie about what I did and didn't say, you clearly aren't reiterating what I wrote in full, but what you wanted to selectively pull out of it. As for Carnicom not speaking with me, I offered information to him out of my own will, he stated to me that it was very important that we talk about it further and that he would contact me if I couldn't reach him. I made an attempt, but the fact remains that I informed him in my writings of 100% of what my research revealed, so he can do what he will with that information, speaking to him would have been a nice gesture but otherwise just a formality.

Thanks again Gigi, you actually asked me questions through our conversations, and debated your doubts rather than just taking useless jabs at how horrible of a person I am. I'm very happy that I could have at least helped the few open minded individuals that I have met on these boards. To me, that really means that I did do all that I could, the others are just lost and aggressive in their actions and lack the ability to fair scientific debate. I never once took a shot at anyone who didn't deserve it, not here or on lymebusters, but I will not stand to waste my time proving very well detailed research only to be countered with empty attacks on my personal intentions. If you want to question me, and not my research, then I will move right on to calling out what you really are, because you never had interest in any form of research in the first place. Everyone had the chance to be civil, but instead many chose to question me rather than to debate and if that is all that those of you whom are guilty of such are here for, then this is nothing more than a fight board filled with random psuedoscience mixed in with the occasional bit of actual research. Either way, anyone here for logical information is in the middle of a big unorganized fight for nothing.

-Nick