[kmariezw]

The bio-luminescece trait is evidenced within my video , and still images of my own infection by the transgenic organism and its bacterial passenger!

In fact, the discovery of this bio-luminescent terrestrial bacteria is, I believe, directly due to the fact that the transgenic nematodes were enhanced with, the luminescence gene from jelly-fish (green fluorescent protein (GFP)) and in turn created the new bioluminescent bacterial species. This enhancement is in addition to other genetic enhancements made, which I shall attempt to explain later in this e-mail.
It seems obvious to me, since my recent discovery of a fillarial nematode type organism emerging from my head hair/scalp,

which I recorded and provided a link to at www.youtube.com/morgellons and still images of its relatives at http://adobe.kodakgallery.co.uk/I.js...&y=-uez2umthat this transgenic nematode, and its dispersal in the environment, is the cause of the disease phenomenon known as Morgellons Disease, of which I am suffering from, and have had for seven-years approximately.

In fact this video evidence, coupled with over one-hundred still images I posted upon the Internet, and the fact that I made conjecture to the possibility of nematode involvement being the cause of the disease known as “morgellons”, in an email back in September 2006, are altogether overwhelming.

Coupled with the evidence of the twelve documented infections of an emerging new bacteriasl disease, which I make reference to, the facts of the transgenic nematodes’ creation, its timeline of creation and its dispersal into the environment, the discovery of this bioluminescent bacteria and the timeline of the emergence of Morgellons Disease are, OVERWHELMING!! and deserves an immediate investigation to safeguard the future Public health.

This, I believe, is the smoking-gun, the metaphoric fingerprint. Evidence that when viewed together, identifies a new threat. I have made direct refferal, and use of, papers’submitted by the Scientist , and Authority on the subject of creating transgenic nematodes, and their dispersal, Dr Randy Gaugler.

See: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/arthro.../9605201r.html

See: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/bi...nematodes.html

See: http://www.cook.rutgers.edu/~turf/ex...snematodes.pdf

I hope that this information is taken seriously and acted upon immediately. Although I am not, by nature prone to the belief of conspiracy theories. I am reminded of a quote from the author Michael Crichton:

“Bioengineered DNA was, weight for weight, the most valuable material in the world. A single microscopic bacterium, too small to see with the human eye, but containing the gene for a heart attack enzyme, streptokinase, or for “ice-minus” which prevented frost damage to crops, might be worth 5 billion dollars to the right buyer.”
Michael Crichton - Jurassic Park

With that in mind See: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/bi...nematodes.html

Which states:

Of the nearly thirty steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes identified to date, seven species are commercially available. One billion nematodes per acre (250,000 per m2) is the rule-of-thumb against most soil insects (containerised and greenhouse soils tend to be treated at higher rates).

The latter was reflected in recent statistics, indicating that farmers spend about US$20 billion worldwide, and US$ 6-8 billion annually in USA on crop protection (Anonymous1991).

These amounts of money involved are staggering, and as a result I cannot help but wonder at the vested interests there are out there, amongst the scientists, entomoligists, companies etc. that will wish to ensure the success of the commercialisation of transgenic nematodes. I know of over thirty companies in the US of A that specialise in the supply of these “Nematode Nemesis”!

Another genetic enhancement made makes use of Heat shock proteins that allow the nematode to survive conditions it otherwise unaltered would not, excess heat, toxins etc. My other concern about this is that the donor nematode was a much more widely dispersed nematode, C Elegans, which hails from a family of nematodes (Rhabditidae), that are harmful to humans, and known to affect human health.

The CDC (Centre for Disease Control), The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, and NCBI (The National Center for Biotechnology Information)
all have articles about the twelve cases of infection by Photorhabdus species

See: Bio-luminescent Bacteria as Emerging Human Pathogens?

At the United States CDC’S website: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol9no2/02-0222.htm

or Journal of Clinical Microbiology website: http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/43/8/4152

or NCBI website: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

or The Lancet website: http://www.thelancet.com

In particular I would like to draw your attention to the statement made and published under the title:

See at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol9no2/02-0222.htm#1 Photorhabdus Species: Bioluminescent Bacteria as Emerging Human Pathogens?Photorhabdus spp. have been the subject of intensive study by agricultural scientists because of the role these bacteria play in controlling insects. Insects, like humans, are subject to infestation by nematodes. Photorhabdus spp. inhabit the gut of some insect-pathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditis spp.), where they form a symbiotic relationship.

Nematode species of this type are able to invade the larvae of susceptible insects and release Photorhabdus spp. The bacteria proliferate and promote nematode reproduction by killing the insect larvae. Insect-pathogenic nematodes harboring Photorhabdus spp are used as biopesticides in a number of countries, including the United States and Australia. Agricultural scientists are also attempting to develop insect-resistant transgenic crops by using insecticidal toxin genes derived from Photorhabdus spp..

Photorhabdus spp. are not human commensals. The patients apparently acquired the pathogen from an unidentified source in the terrestrial environment. This hypothesis is supported by the observations that at least 4/6 of the Australian patients were engaged in outdoor activities around the time of acquisition and that the initial site of infection was on the lower limbs in more than half of Australian and American case-patients.
Photorhabdus spp. have never been shown to live freely in soil, although they will survive in soil under laboratory conditions. Photorhabdus spp. have only been isolated naturally from two nonclinical sources: insect-pathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditis spp) and the insects they parasitize (beetles, moths, and the like). It seems likely therefore that Photorhabdus spp are transmitted to humans by a terrestrial invertebrate (nematode or arthropod), but that vector (delivery method) has not yet been identified.

(commensals = where one organism benefits and the other is neither harmed nor helped, Latin com mensa, meaning sharing a table.)

Now balance that with the statement made by Dr Randy Gaugler in his paper of 1996 at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/arthro.../9605201r.html

Which states:

APHIS has categorized H. bacteriophora as among “low-risk organisms which have already been released in the U.S.”