Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jason Hi Kritters,
I think thats what is happening now, doctors run tests and things look okay in some people in other people some show lyme disease and/or coinfections like babesia and bartonella and/or chlamydia pneumonia and/or viral infections.
But as there is no such disease medically for Morgellons as nobody even knows what it is then tests won't be able to confirm it. The million dollar question is why are some people plagued with all these other testable diseases and also have Morgellon symptoms. Surely there must be some correlation? |
Just quickly here, because I have more thoughts and no time...I agree, Jason. I have my own theories (gee, why haven't all the scientists been banging on my door to ask?
) I'll get to later. I think when you say there is no disease medically for Morgellons, they don't know what organism to stain for or isolate or when they see it (or don't....since it probably doesn't have a membrane) they wouldn't know it anyway. but this is just one thought. When you say, "surely there must be some correlation?" I agree. and that correlation may be that there are either different morphed versions based on one organism or the same one settles in on different parts of the body and takes up the dna relatively. I know this sounds bizarre, probably, but I gotta tell ya, I'm not impressed with what the reasearchers are coming up with just even regarding malaria that's been around for so long, not to mention the influenza virus. I mean, what the heck are they overlooking? There has to be a common denominator with all organisms and it's like they are missing the forest for the trees.
grrrr.
Kritts