Good question! I know most dermatologists (and the contageous disease docs like the one I went to) don't even acknowledge the lesions are real, which is incredulous to me.
I'm embarassed to say here that I did have one Lyme specialist want to take biopsies, but they healed before I could get in (then others opened later and I just started with our treatments) I was thinking he wanted biopsies for detection of cancer, not giving him the benefit of the doubt. If I get another biggie, I'll go back, but I do remember that I didn't get the impression he was all that curious what the biopsies would show. Could be my pre-disposed attitude regarding docs
.
I just had another thought. Not knowing how the biopsy thingie is carried out, I'm wondering if they just test for known substances and if Morg has an undiscovered component, would they just not see it or would they question it? ??? probably a dumb question.
Kritters